Free Trial

BOE: Pill may remain more hawkish than the median MPC member for some time

BOE
  • Overall a pretty interesting speech from Pill regarding why he didn't vote for a cut in August. He says he likes to "cross-check" the BOE's main forecasting models with a BVAR model.
  • A BVAR model in general can be described more as being statistically rather than fundamentally driven. The model is then broken down into structural drivers.
  • One of these is that the level of R* is higher in the BVAR model than in the BOE's standard models. Pill notes that this is "consistent with the view that the framework underlying the MPC’s forecasts assumes too low a level for the natural rate of interest or R-star."
  • The BVAR model also estimates that there is less economic slack than the BOE's standard models.
  • These concerns have been enough to stop Pill voting for a cut in August.
  • However, the other underlying message (which isn't explicitly spelt out in the speech) is that if Pill believes R* is higher than the BOE central estimates, then even if he does start to vote for cuts at some point, he may prefer to end the cutting cycle earlier than other members of the MPC. So he may well remain on the more hawkish side of the Committee for some time. That is not much of a surprise, but today's speech seems to be confirmation.
  • Note that the median estimate of the neutral rate in the BOE's MaPS survey (which MPC members often refer to) is 3.50%. Markets currently fully price cuts to 3.75% by the August 2025 meeting.
249 words

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.
  • Overall a pretty interesting speech from Pill regarding why he didn't vote for a cut in August. He says he likes to "cross-check" the BOE's main forecasting models with a BVAR model.
  • A BVAR model in general can be described more as being statistically rather than fundamentally driven. The model is then broken down into structural drivers.
  • One of these is that the level of R* is higher in the BVAR model than in the BOE's standard models. Pill notes that this is "consistent with the view that the framework underlying the MPC’s forecasts assumes too low a level for the natural rate of interest or R-star."
  • The BVAR model also estimates that there is less economic slack than the BOE's standard models.
  • These concerns have been enough to stop Pill voting for a cut in August.
  • However, the other underlying message (which isn't explicitly spelt out in the speech) is that if Pill believes R* is higher than the BOE central estimates, then even if he does start to vote for cuts at some point, he may prefer to end the cutting cycle earlier than other members of the MPC. So he may well remain on the more hawkish side of the Committee for some time. That is not much of a surprise, but today's speech seems to be confirmation.
  • Note that the median estimate of the neutral rate in the BOE's MaPS survey (which MPC members often refer to) is 3.50%. Markets currently fully price cuts to 3.75% by the August 2025 meeting.