Free Trial

FED: Daly: Gradual Doesn't Mean As Much As You Might Think

FED

Daly: Bernanke introduced the idea of gradualism to me in 2003. When you’re less certain about where your destination will be then you take a more gradual approach to rate changes. We spend most of our time in an uncertainty space so it naturally implies the language you’ve been hearing about the gradual rate of cuts, which doesn’t mean as much as you might think. 

If you look at the SEP from September, medians were for one or two additional rate cuts for the rest of the year. That was aligned with inflation gradually falling and the labor market staying at this sustainable pace. She repeats that one or two cuts would be a reasonable thing to do. If inflation stays stickier or shows little sign of coming down or the labor market doesn’t look like its settling at that sustainable pace, then you can do fewer. Alternatively, if the labor market falters a little more than it has been or inflation comes down more rapidly than we projected then you can do faster cuts. The clear direction of change is down but the question is what's the pace. The 50bp cut in September was "right-sizing" as we'd been patient for the inflation data to really make it clear that it was on a sustainable path. 

216 words

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.

Daly: Bernanke introduced the idea of gradualism to me in 2003. When you’re less certain about where your destination will be then you take a more gradual approach to rate changes. We spend most of our time in an uncertainty space so it naturally implies the language you’ve been hearing about the gradual rate of cuts, which doesn’t mean as much as you might think. 

If you look at the SEP from September, medians were for one or two additional rate cuts for the rest of the year. That was aligned with inflation gradually falling and the labor market staying at this sustainable pace. She repeats that one or two cuts would be a reasonable thing to do. If inflation stays stickier or shows little sign of coming down or the labor market doesn’t look like its settling at that sustainable pace, then you can do fewer. Alternatively, if the labor market falters a little more than it has been or inflation comes down more rapidly than we projected then you can do faster cuts. The clear direction of change is down but the question is what's the pace. The 50bp cut in September was "right-sizing" as we'd been patient for the inflation data to really make it clear that it was on a sustainable path.