Free Trial

MNI ANALYSIS: China RRR Cut Raises Questions on PBOC Policy

By Nerys Avery
     LONDON (MNI) - Less than two weeks after S&P Global Ratings cut China's
sovereign credit rating over concerns about the rapid expansion of the country's
debt , the People's Bank of China appears to be opening the floodgates to
another surge of lending, ostensibly under the government's "inclusive finance"
campaign.
     The PBOC said it will make selective reductions to banks' reserve
requirement ratios (RRR) starting from Jan. 1, 2018 based on how much they
loaned in 2017 to small and micro enterprises and to other borrowers that fall
under the government's "inclusive finance" label. This includes the agriculture
sector, start-ups, students and those living below the poverty line.
     Analysts' estimates of the amount of money the cuts will flush into the
financial system range from CNY300 billion to CNY800 billion, but the final
figure could be much higher. That gives naysayers plenty of ammunition to shoot
down both the central bank's insistence that it is following a prudent and
neutral monetary policy and the government's campaign to rein in leverage in the
financial sector and curb financial risks.
     However, the lower reserve requirements may not be as much of a monetary
loosening as first appears. The central bank may be trying to ward off a crunch
in bank liquidity early next year that could result from the tightening of
banks' access to wholesale funding through the sale of Negotiable Certificates
of Deposit (NCD) and a change in the classification of NCD on lenders' balance
sheets. The PBOC may also have decided to permanently replace some of the
liquidity lost from the financial system over the past two-and-a-half years
through capital outflows.
     The central bank reverted to its bad old habits last week, making the
announcement not only on a Saturday evening but at the beginning of a week-long
public holiday on the Chinese mainland. In a way, the timing was understandable
- the PBOC probably wanted to avoid triggering any unwanted volatility in
domestic markets by giving them time to digest a rather bizarre twist on its
reserve requirement ratio policy that could be interpreted as a significant
climb-down from its longstanding financial deleveraging and liquidity tightening
campaigns.
     CNY22 TRILLION LOCKED UP
     According to the PBOC statement, banks who can show that 1.5% of their new
loans in 2017, or 1.5% of outstanding loans at end-2017, were made to these
targeted sectors will get a 50 basis-point reduction in their RRR from Jan. 1.
Those who can show that 10% or more of their new loans, or 10% of their
outstanding loans, have gone to those sectors will get an additional 100
basis-point reduction.
     The RRR for the country's biggest banks currently stands at 17% of total
eligible deposits, although the central bank operates a differentiated policy
that gives some banks a rate as low as 15% if they meet certain criteria. Fitch
Ratings says there's about CNY22 trillion of RRR money locked up at the central
bank.
     The PBOC said that all large and medium-sized banks, 90% of city commercial
banks and 95% of rural commercial banks are already eligible for the 50
basis-point cut. But it didn't give an indication of the number of banks who
would qualify for the bigger cut. Neither did it put a figure on the amount of
liquidity that might be released.
     The PBOC said the decision to cut reserve requirement ratios for loans to
its targeted sectors represented a "structural adjustment" and should not be
interpreted as a shift away from its prudent and neutral monetary policy. "The
targeted ratio cut is an incentive mechanism to allocate more financial
resources to inclusive finance and optimize the lending structure," it said.
     Societe Generale estimates the move will free up at least CNY800 billion of
liquidity, assuming unchanged deposit growth in the fourth quarter. Analysts at
Chinese brokerage Lianxun Securities put the amount at CNY700 billion.
     Morgan Stanley's economists estimate the liquidity injection at only an
incremental CNY300 billion next year because, they say, the move is not a
broad-based RRR reduction but a targeted one that only makes more banks eligible
to benefit from a policy that started in 2014. They say that while most banks
will qualify for the first 50 basis-point cut, getting the extra 100 basis-point
cut will be hard to achieve, especially given there are only three months left
to achieve that target.
     However, in theory, if all banks qualified for the entire 150 basis-point
reduction, that could amount to anything between CNY1.4 trillion and CNY2
trillion of liquidity potentially available for lending, depending on whose
estimates are used for the total amount of eligible bank deposits held as RRR at
the central bank. Given banks' ingenuity in finding ways to game the system,
that's not entirely impossible. To put the figures into context, banks doled out
roughly CNY10 trillion in new loans in the first eight months of this year.
     POLICY BUZZWORD
     Inclusive finance has become a buzzword in policy making circles over the
last few months as the government has sought to push more lending into the real
economy to support growth and to stop investors from using idle funds to
leverage up and speculate in financial markets. In May, China's large commercial
banks were told to set up inclusive finance departments to support small
companies, agriculture, poverty relief and entrepreneurship by the end of 2017.
     The prospect of a 150 basis-point cut in their RRR is a significant
incentive for banks to lend to the government's targeted sectors. And it's
especially attractive for smaller lenders who are suffering from liquidity
shortages as a result of the central bank's campaign to curb financial leverage,
which has tightened wholesale funding availability in the interbank market and
pushed money-market rates higher.
     Banks' access to wholesale funding through the interbank market looks like
it will be curtailed next year. The central bank banned the sale of NCD with
tenors of more than one year starting from Sept. 1, and will force banks with
assets of more than CNY500 billion to include them as interbank liabilities on
their balance sheets from Jan. 1, 2018. Under the PBOC's Macro Prudential
Assessment criteria, interbank liabilities are limited to a third of total
liabilities so the shifting of NCD into that category will reduce the amount of
certificates banks can issue to raise funds. Faced with a potential squeeze on
liquidity, a cut in the RRR would provide welcome relief for many banks.
     Though PBOC denied the RRR cut represents a shift its monetary policy
stance, it's a stretch to believe that, given the amount of liquidity the move
could release and the central bank's publicly-stated opposition to using the
ratio as a monetary policy tool for the last couple of years.
     The last across-the-board reserve-ratio cut was announced in February 2016,
and officials have repeatedly said that a reduction would send too big a signal
of easing and would exacerbate capital outflows. Although there have been a few
small targeted RRR cuts, the central bank has mostly relied on open-market
operations and targeted loans through its Medium-term Lending Facility to manage
liquidity. While the central bank is claiming this latest RRR move is a targeted
reduction, it's hard to take that seriously when the PBOC itself admits that
nearly all banks will benefit from at least a 50 basis-point cut.
     One also has to wonder whether the PBOC is really serious about being
prudent and reining in financial risks if it is encouraging banks to lend to
SMEs, start-ups and the agriculture sector - customers that are traditionally
among the most risky and don't have the collateral that banks in China usually
demand.
     But the RRR cut demonstrates once again that the Chinese central bank is
not independent and must follow the orders of the government and the ruling
Communist Party, whether it likes it or not. The State Council statement posted
on the government's website three days before the PBOC's announcement gives some
indication that this is a political decision stemming from growing concern about
job creation.
     "Small and micro businesses have been a strong pillar for employment,
offering strong support for large and medium enterprises, and increased the
vitality of society," Premier Li Keqiang was quoted as saying. "We should
encourage financial institutions to lower their requirements and strengthen
capacities to serve the real economy."
     The statement said small and micro companies have played a pivotal role in
creating new jobs, and cited data from the National Bureau of Statistics that
each small and micro enterprise could help create eight new jobs.
     The message seems to be that policymakers are determined to force money to
flow to sectors of the economy that they believe will create jobs to sustain
growth and maintain social stability. They also want to boost support for the
government's mass entrepreneurship and innovation strategies. These are aimed at
encouraging people to set up their own companies with innovative business ideas
to keep economic growth humming as government measures to tackle industrial
overcapacity, state-owned enterprise reform and pollution damp the country's
traditional growth drivers.
     Whatever the rationale for the cut in reserve requirement ratios, it will
do little to boost confidence that the Chinese authorities are serious about
tackling their credit growth and debt problems.
--MNI Beijing Bureau; +44 203-586-2244; email: nerys.avery@marketnews.com
[TOPICS: MMQPB$,M$A$$$,M$Q$$$,MT$$$$]

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.