Free Trial

MNI INTERVIEW: BOE Over-Emphasises Expectations:Ex-MPC's Weale

--Martin Weale: Role of Price Expectations In Standard Models Too Strong 
--Highlights Shortcomings Of Rational Expectations In Models
By David Robinson
     LONDON (MNI) - Bank of England models which place a lot of weight on price
expectations may have led policymakers to underestimate the danger of prolonged
deviations of inflation from target, former Monetary Policy Committee member
Martin Weale told MNI.
     Business's price expectations had much less influence on future price
movements than standard models assume, suggesting that policymakers should not
take much comfort if firms are anticipating low and stable inflation, Weale said
in an interview.
     "There's a strong strand in economic theory that the expectation of a
firm's ability and need to raise its prices influences actual price movements,"
Weale said, "but this effect appears to be overblown in standard models."
     "While we certainly found an effect, it was much weaker than is typically
used in economic models," he said, adding that in a study with former Bank
colleagues he found that price expectations from the CBI business survey
provided a correlation of about 0.3 with actual price behaviour, compared to the
coefficient of just below 1 assumed in theory.
     "What we found was that .. there was quite a clear tendency for people
giving high price forecasts to realize lower outturns and people giving very low
price forecasts to realize higher outturns," said Weale, who first presented the
results at the Dow lecture last month at the National Institute of Economic and
Social Research.
     Had the models assumed a much lower correlation between expectations and
prices, the Bank may have been more likely to anticipate persistent deviations
in inflation from target, such as the persistent overshoot in 2008 through 2013,
Weale said.
     Bank economists keep looking for better ways to treat expectations. At a
Bank for International Settlement event last year. Francesca Monti, Head of
Modelling in the Monetary Policy Outlook Division, said that the assumption of
full information rational expectations was often questioned by the MPC and that
"the role of expectations in the distant future is too strong."
     --"WELL-ANCHORED" EXPECTATIONS UNCLEAR
     The MPC stresses the importance of inflation expectations being well
anchored to the 2.0% target, but Weale is concerned about the vagueness of the
term.
     "What I was never able to understand was how far expectations had to
deviate from target .. before I should decide they weren't well-anchored anymore
and at times it mattered," he said.
     Another strand of Weale's research looked at the BOE's sterling forecasts.
After the MPC divided down the middle on how to forecast sterling back in
November 1999 it changed its exchange rate projection to one splitting the
difference between a constant exchange rate assumption and uncovered interest
parity (UIP) and has stuck with this ever since.
     Weale's research suggests that simply assuming a flat exchange rate would
have been more accurate. At present, with rate curves near horizontal the
difference between flat and interest differentials are negligible but the choice
of methodology could matter much more in future.
     "It certainly doesn't matter much at the moment. But there might be
circumstances where it would matter and it might be an idea to be ready for
those," Weale said.
     The Bank in its August forecast round shifted from assuming that oil, gas
and electricity prices would follow the futures curves to assuming that they
would remain flat after two quarters, and it is open to question why it should
stick to its currency forecasting convention.
     "I was always a bit unsure why we made one assumption for the exchange rate
and a different assumption for commodity prices .. If you stick to simple
assumptions like flat versus following the forwards markets then these are all
things that are quite easy to check," Weale said.
--MNI London Bureau; tel: +44 203-586-2223; email: david.robinson@marketnews.com
[TOPICS: M$B$$$,M$E$$$,MT$$$$,MX$$$$,M$$BE$]

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.