Exclusive interviews with leading policymakers that convey the true policy message that impacts markets.
Reporting on key macro data at the time of release.
- Emerging MarketsEmerging Markets
Real-time insight of emerging markets in CEMEA, Asia and LatAm region
Real-time insight of oil & gas markets
- MNI ResearchMNI Research
Actionable insight on monetary policy, balance sheet and inflation with focus on global issuance. Analysis on key political risk impacting the global markets.
- About Us
Real-time Actionable Insight
Repeats Story Initially Transmitted at 06:55 GMT Sep 21/02:55 EST Sep 21
--Rome Government Sees Saver Protection As Priority
--Harmonised EU Resolution Cooperation and Clearer Rules Needed
--State-aid Interpretation On Bank Bail Rescues Should Be Reviewed
By Silvia Marchetti
ROME (MNI) - Italian authorities are pushing for a revision to the new
Europe-wide Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD), aiming to introduce a
"transition period" that shields certain savers, whilst improving cooperation
between European and national supervisory bodies if there are future banking
Several top Italian officials told Market News that the main goal is to
prevent new bail-in rules being "retroactive" and thus penalize all retail
investors who subscribed to high-risk subordinate bonds prior to 2016, when the
BRRD came into force. The revision of the directive must be launched by June
2018, making it urgent that steps are soon taken in coming months.
"We are very concerned to protect bondholders now liable to be bailed in
under the EU's new directive, especially retail investors who bought bonds prior
to the BRRD coming into force at the beginning of the year who were not aware of
what they were buying and, above all, of how the rules were effectively going to
affect them," Giampaolo Galli, Democrat member of the Lower House Budget
committee told MNI.
These retail investors should qualify, at least morally, for some sort of
"shield" that would make them an "exception" to the application of the BRRD, he
According to the new bail-in rules, since the start of 2016 not just
shareholders but also subordinate bond holders and deposit holders of over
E100,000 must contribute to the burdens-sharing cost of saving their own failing
For Rome, finding a solution through a slight restyle of the BRRD at EU
level would have an enormous impact on the solidity and perception of Italy's
financial sector, still viewed by Italian savers and several institutional
investors as a depositary of trust despite structural weaknesses and recent bank
crises, said Galli.
"We would like a softer, gradual application of the directive, with a
transitory phase that would benefit Italian savers. They have put their money
and trust in Italian banks and are among those in Europe who have purchased the
most subordinate bonds lately," he added.
According to latest data, high-risk bonds currently in circulation in Italy
amount to roughly E61 billion, of which E23 billion are held by households. By
2017, 10.3% of all subordinate bonds will expire and must be reimbursed to
"In recent years, there has been a rise in the purchase of subordinate and
bank bonds by families as, due to the crisis, many were willing to risk by
purchasing unstable securities in order to gain higher profits," said Galli.
Bank funding is also on the rise, despite the high level of bad loans still
sitting on lenders balance sheets. With over E200 billion placed in bank bonds
that shows how Italians still trust their banks.
ITALY A "TESTING" PLATFORM FOR THE NEW BRRD
The rescue of four Italian lenders earlier this year forced Italian
authorities to "by-pass" BRRD rules by applying national regulation, enabling
public intervention via liquidation rather than resolution.
Ever since, Finance Minister Pier Carlo Padoan, Bank of Italy governor
Ignazio Visco and the ABI, Italy's banking lobby, have repeatedly called for a
revision of the BRRD.
Visco has warned Europe not to lose a window of opportunity to boost
cooperation between national and European bodies over banking resolution and
introduce a "transitory" period in order to clarify and adjust the framework
The four banks rescued by Rome's government a few months ago brought to
light the "critical" aspects of the BRRD, that sets out some leeway for state
aid but only in the wake of an acute, "systemic" and unexpected economic crisis
which for Brussels was not then the case.
"The whole point is on the interpretation of what 'acute' means", explained
an Italian Treasury official.
"We stepped-in with E5 billion to save the four banks because their failure
would have killed jobs, destroyed family savings, hampered banking operations
and services, and put at stake our financial stability. For us it was a systemic
risk," he said.
In a recent speech, Visco said it was crucial to balance out the needs of
lenders in the new changing regulation scenario, and those of savers and bond
holders, which is the core focus of the current debate over the revision of the
Rome might stand a chance of success, notes another Treasury source, close
"We are not asking this for this revision simply for the good of Italy, but
for the good of all European countries who are facing, or will likely face,
similar issues like the ones we had to deal with. There are a few critical
aspects that need be fixed. Eventual changes to the BRRD, having clearer rules
more focused on savers' protection, would benefit the whole union," he said.
Galli argued that support for Italy's crusade is mounting, especially among
southern peers more vulnerable to financial shocks and who are coping with
similar banking issues.
He expressed confidence that the directive would be adjusted but that
timing was crucial. Galli also suggested protecting both subordinate and
insubordinate bank bond holders, stressing that the directive should apply only
to newly-issued securities after 2016.
Italy's central banker Visco has warned that the risks of the BRRD
"transition" period were underestimated and that in applying the new rules
financial stability must not be jeopardized.
Speaking at the Bank of Italy's recent annual confernece, Visco said that
in adherence to the principles underpinning the new European rules
"authorities' interventions must be designed to preserve the value of banking
activity, to the benefit of savers and borrower firms."
"We cannot run the risk of undermining confidence in the banks and in the
savings in their custody," he added.
Visco also criticised the lack of effective coordination in banking crises.
"Today, under the new European arrangements, crisis interventions are assigned
to multiple, mutually independent authorities and institutions, both national
and supranational, with the decision-making processes relatively incompatible
with rapid intervention".
A revision of the directive would need to address a lack of clarity in
applying the new rules, along with a more lenient approach, too.
Across Europe, resolution tools can only be used when it is in the public
interest, that is when it is necessary to safeguard financial stability or to
protect depositors and taxpayers. According to Rome, it is as yet unclear how
the European Resolution Authority will put this principle into practice.
In all other cases banks are put into liquidation in accordance with
national legislation, but governments cannot be forced each time into "acrobatic
performances through last-minute, controversial emergency decrees to save banks
and savers," said Galli.
Italy is now looking to the US model, which allows more flexible use of
resolution tools and broader access to public funds, even if on a temporary
basis, but allowing crises to be managed in such a way as to minimize the
destruction of value and limit the impact on financial stability.
--MNI London Bureau; tel: +44 203-586-2225; email: email@example.com
Sign up now for free access to this content.
Please enter your details below and select your areas of interest.
Why Subscribe to
MNI is the leading providerof news and intelligence specifically for the Global Foreign Exchange and Fixed Income Markets, providing timely, relevant, and critical insight for market professionals and those who want to make informed investment decisions. We offer not simply news, but news analysis, linking breaking news to the effects on capital markets. Our exclusive information and intelligence moves markets.
Our credibilityfor delivering mission-critical information has been built over three decades. The quality and experience of MNI's team of analysts and reporters across America, Asia and Europe truly sets us apart. Our Markets team includes former fixed-income specialists, currency traders, economists and strategists, who are able to combine expertise on macro economics, financial markets, and political risk to give a comprehensive and holistic insight on global markets.