Drop In Unemployment Rate Not Driven By Labour Market Strength, Says ING

Drop In Unemployment Rate Not Driven By Labour Market Strength, Says ING

ING are sceptical at reading too much into the drop in the South Korean unemployment rate: "As well as being a lagged indicator for the rest of the economy, there are good reasons for being very careful when interpreting the meaning of shifts in a country's unemployment rate. This is very much the case with the upbeat sounding fall in Korea's July unemployment rate to 3.3% from 3.7% in June. At first glance, this looks to be a much stronger outcome than the small rise to 3.8% that the consensus had expected."

• ING points out that there were 173k fewer unemployed in July, but this number wasn't matched by a gain in employment: "When you look at the numbers of employed, you see that these only rose by 11 thousand in July, so the unemployment rate is not falling because the unemployed are finding jobs. So where are they going? The answer is a vague one, but "out of the labour force" is the basic story. This might include retirement, or simply disaffection with employment prospects leading to a "choice" not to work, or a return to homemaking or other non-paid work (looking after elderly, sick, young etc)."
• The labour market is likely to factor into to BoK thinking, ING says "A release like this poses some headaches for policymakers. On the one hand, any fall in the available labour supply could be viewed as potentially inflationary, though Korea does not really suffer from the same labour market bottlenecks that are affecting economies such as the United States, and its inflation rate remains very low. So that isn't a worry. "
• The note goes on to say: "After giving a clear signal of their intent to start raising rates this year, the biggest risk to our October rate hike forecast remains the Covid-19 backdrop, not the labour market. For now, the Covid situation in Korea is reasonably steady. An October hike still seems plausible. But we will keep watching the data - all it would take would be a few days of bad Covid data and hints of movement restrictions for this forecast to require revising."