Free Trial

MNI POLICY: US-China Phase 2 Deal Seen Unlikely This Year

--US-China Relations Committee's Dong Says Phase 1 Left Out Big Issues
By Greg Quinn
     SEATTLE (MNI) - China and the U.S. will struggle to pull together a
complete trade agreement this year, as the preliminary Phase One deal set to be
signed this month appears to have left out most of the tough issues, National
Committee on U.S.-China Relations Director Nelson Dong told MNI.
     The stumbling blocks are around things such as technology transfers,
subsidies and state-owned enterprises, Dong said in a phone interview on
Tuesday.
     "It will be very hard to get to a Phase Two agreement. They have mostly
kicked the can down the road in terms of the harder structural issues."
     "There is no indication even in the most optimistic and rosy summaries of
Phase One that the Chinese have really given a whole lot of ground in that
domain," said Dong, a senior partner at the Dorsey & Whitney law firm in
Seattle. The U.S.-China relations committee is a nonprofit established in 1966
whose members include Henry Kissinger and former Treasury Secretary Michael
Blumenthal.
     President Xi Jinping and others want to resist perceptions they are making
big concessions under U.S. pressure, he said. On the American side, while Donald
Trump's supporters will stick with him through just about any trade posture with
China during this year's presidential election, Congress is showing bipartisan
support for a harder line.
     While that means China has little incentive for stalling talks to see if
Trump loses, the chances for a fresh breakdown in trade talks are still
amplified by other issues. Those include the protests in Hong Kong, Taiwan's
Jan. 11 election and China's ties to Iran and its oil industry, he said.
     "There are any number of things that could pop and create a new flashpoint
in the relationship," he said. "The political season this year is going to be
very hard to predict on the international front," Dong said.
     A first-stage U.S.-China deal came just in time to avoid threatened Dec. 15
tariffs on $160 billion of imports, but beyond that the deal featured only a
minor tariff rollback, leaving duties on two-thirds of imports from China, worth
more than $350 billion. The risk of a global trade war led the IMF to slash
growth forecasts and was part of the reason the Fed led a wave of interest-rate
cuts last year.
     --TECH SECTOR
     The U.S. might also use other tools that irritate China, such as foreign
investment rules and export controls that blunt competition from tech companies
like ZTE and Huawei, Dong said.
     "There will still be deep concern and hostility around the tech sector," he
said.
     U.S. tech companies face a downside from trade policy if Chinese firms
decide to go it alone and build their own networks that become rivals to
American products. Chinese and U.S. companies may also skirt trade restrictions
by moving production to nearby nations or the North American free trade zone, he
said.
     China's reluctance to match Trump's frequent comments touting Phase One
reflects a different government that doesn't need to pump up popular support, he
said. Keen students of American politics, they also know that it could be
damaging to be drawn into a war of words with Trump.
     "They are probably seeing that the less they say, the better it is for them
in terms of acknowledging that China has had to give any ground at all," Dong
said.
--MNI Ottawa Bureau; +1 613-314-9647; email: greg.quinn@marketnews.com
--MNI London Bureau; +44 203 865 3829; email: jason.webb@marketnews.com
[TOPICS: M$A$$$,M$Q$$$,M$U$$$,MC$$$$,MI$$$$,MT$$$$,MGQ$$$,MGU$$$]

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.