MNI China Daily Summary: Thursday, July 18

MNI BRIEF: China To Upgrade Rural Land Reform: 3rd Plenum

MNI BRIEF: China's Third Plenum Eye's Deeper Financial Reform

MNI BRIEF: China Third Plenum Expands International Opening

MNI China Press Digest July 18: PBOC, Beijing, Arctic Shipping

MNI: PBOC Net Injects CNY47 Bln Via OMO Thurs; Rates Unchanged

MNI: EUROZONE MAY CONSTRUCTION OUTPUT -0.9% M/M, -2.4% Y/Y

UK private regular wage growth shows big drop in single month figures

TLFS transition delayed again

RPT-MNI: Canada Sticks To Fiscal Anchors, Spends Chunk Of Windfall

© 1982-2024 MNI. All rights reserved.
Terms | Privacy
Log Out
Free Trial

WBD Bonds Sell Off On Reports Of Split; Debt Expected To Remain With TV Segment

COMMUNICATIONS
Credit BulletsBulletHomepagemarkets-real-timeCredit

Baa3/BBB-/BBB- EUR 27s/30s/33s +5bp/+15bp/+20bp

  • FY23 EBITDA of ~USD 10bn would fall to USD ~8bn were the Studios and DTC (i.e. streaming) verticals to be split from the group, leaving Networks (i.e. TV) behind.
  • Were the USD ~40bn in net debt to remain with the TV entity, this would result in an increase in leverage from ~4x to ~5x.
  • S&P affirmed WBD in March at which point they saw leverage at 4.3x in 2024 and dropping to 3.5x by end-2025 against a downside threshold of remaining above 3.5x on an inability to return to EBITDA growth.
  • Though WBD is already significantly above the downside threshold, any deal would be unlikely to close until closer to the end of the deleveraging pathway laid out by S&P though WBD would still likely end up with leverage above current levels.
  • Combined with the loss of their significant growth drivers, we don’t think a two-notch downgrade would be out of the question, placing the remaining entity firmly into HY territory.
  • Looking at the docs we don’t see language that would prevent this move; there is reference to the issuer not being able to sell/transfer assets “substantially as an entirety” but the fact that the activities under consideration for disposal are relatively small compared to the TV business doesn’t likely meet the threshold even if they are future growth drivers.
223 words

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.

Baa3/BBB-/BBB- EUR 27s/30s/33s +5bp/+15bp/+20bp

  • FY23 EBITDA of ~USD 10bn would fall to USD ~8bn were the Studios and DTC (i.e. streaming) verticals to be split from the group, leaving Networks (i.e. TV) behind.
  • Were the USD ~40bn in net debt to remain with the TV entity, this would result in an increase in leverage from ~4x to ~5x.
  • S&P affirmed WBD in March at which point they saw leverage at 4.3x in 2024 and dropping to 3.5x by end-2025 against a downside threshold of remaining above 3.5x on an inability to return to EBITDA growth.
  • Though WBD is already significantly above the downside threshold, any deal would be unlikely to close until closer to the end of the deleveraging pathway laid out by S&P though WBD would still likely end up with leverage above current levels.
  • Combined with the loss of their significant growth drivers, we don’t think a two-notch downgrade would be out of the question, placing the remaining entity firmly into HY territory.
  • Looking at the docs we don’t see language that would prevent this move; there is reference to the issuer not being able to sell/transfer assets “substantially as an entirety” but the fact that the activities under consideration for disposal are relatively small compared to the TV business doesn’t likely meet the threshold even if they are future growth drivers.