Free Trial

ECB: Nagel Sees No Compelling Case For ECB Dot Plots

ECB

ECB's Nagel overall sees no "compelling case for introducing dot plots for the Eurosystem" in his speech today at Harvard University, looking at Governing Council independence, monpol communication effectiveness, and projection uncertainty communication. However, Nagel nods to the ongoing interim strategy review, which "includes an analysis of how risk and uncertainty should inform both policy decisions and policy communication" - so there might be some demand from him to update how the ECB reacts to projection uncertainty. Key highlights below:

  • Nagel appears hesitant to introduce the plots from the perspective of Governing Council independence: "Dot plots would force all Governing Council members to regularly articulate their perspectives on the future trajectory of interest rates [...] we are well advised not to put ourselves in a situation that might increase pressure on us to act in ways others want us to."
  • He is "sceptical" if a dot plot could "significantly enhance the Eurosystem’s effectiveness of monetary policy communication" on the back of "comparative studies on different methods of monetary policy communication [being] inconclusive".
  • Nagel additionally thinks there are "better alternatives" from the standpoint of communicating uncertainty around inflation projections.
  • Specifically, he mentions the enhancement of existing communication methods, as well as "develop[ing] new measures, such as scenario and sensitivity analyses, as well as improved fan charts". The reference to fan charts here is interesting as the Bernanke review of the BOE's communication suggested that fan charts were not an optimal communication device and noted that the BOE should rely on them less.
247 words

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.

ECB's Nagel overall sees no "compelling case for introducing dot plots for the Eurosystem" in his speech today at Harvard University, looking at Governing Council independence, monpol communication effectiveness, and projection uncertainty communication. However, Nagel nods to the ongoing interim strategy review, which "includes an analysis of how risk and uncertainty should inform both policy decisions and policy communication" - so there might be some demand from him to update how the ECB reacts to projection uncertainty. Key highlights below:

  • Nagel appears hesitant to introduce the plots from the perspective of Governing Council independence: "Dot plots would force all Governing Council members to regularly articulate their perspectives on the future trajectory of interest rates [...] we are well advised not to put ourselves in a situation that might increase pressure on us to act in ways others want us to."
  • He is "sceptical" if a dot plot could "significantly enhance the Eurosystem’s effectiveness of monetary policy communication" on the back of "comparative studies on different methods of monetary policy communication [being] inconclusive".
  • Nagel additionally thinks there are "better alternatives" from the standpoint of communicating uncertainty around inflation projections.
  • Specifically, he mentions the enhancement of existing communication methods, as well as "develop[ing] new measures, such as scenario and sensitivity analyses, as well as improved fan charts". The reference to fan charts here is interesting as the Bernanke review of the BOE's communication suggested that fan charts were not an optimal communication device and noted that the BOE should rely on them less.