Trial now

(Z1) Shallow Bounce


Trend Needle Still Points North


Biden Losing Support On COVID-19 Strategy: Poll


Slide Accelerates


Snapshot: USDMXN Set To Post Highest 2021 Close


Still Looking For Weakness

Repeats Story Initially Transmitted at 04:38 GMT Nov 1/00:38 EST Nov 1
--Loopholes Could Keep Local Debt Circulating
--Some See Concerns As Overblown
     BEIJING (MNI) - The Chinese government will continue its attempts to clamp
down on the growth of local government debt, but the unresolved issue of how to
adequately finance local government projects to maintain stable growth means
that implementation of the debt curbs is likely to fall short of expectations,
experts told MNI. 
     As President Xi Jinping and other government officials stressed during the
19th Communist Party Congress last month, how the world's second-largest economy
maintains economic growth while taming the nation's rapidly rising debt,
particularly local government debt, remains a troublesome question.
     Xin Liu, director of sovereign and international public finance ratings at
ratings agency S&P Global, said in an interview with MNI that local government
debt is still growing, but the growth "may be slightly slower than before."
     "In general, we don't see that local governments are likely to deleverage
anytime soon because there are a lot of LGFVs that are still doing financing for
local governments," she said, referring to local government financing vehicles,
which are in theory prohibited from raising off-budget funds for local
     China's rapid credit growth has supported the infrastructure building and
real estate construction that have been the main drivers of GDP growth over the
past decade. According to the International Monetary Fund, China's credit growth
averaged 20% per year from 2009 to 2015, much higher than its annual nominal GDP
     Local governments finance on average about 80% of their expenditures but
only receive around 50% of tax revenues collected locally, with the other 50%
handed over to the central government. 
     They thus struggle to find extra financing channels to fill the gap, often
turning to land sales or LGFV funding -- methods the central government is
trying to cut back on or block. 
     In recent years, the central government has frequently issued new policies
to speed up deleveraging at the local level. At the end of 2014, the "No. 43
document" issued by the State Council mandated a strict delineation between
corporate debt and local government debt, and also prohibited local governments
from obtaining funding through LGFVs -- companies that are usually set up by the
local government to do off-budget financing, mostly for infrastructure projects.
     During the period of rapid growth after 2008, LGFVs provided much of the
funding for local governments, with the financing being categorized as corporate
debt, leading to an abnormally high -- and disguised -- leverage rate in the
corporate sector.
     As the central government's regulatory push has intensified, implementation
of debt restrictions at the local level has often been at odds with the
principle set by the top level. Local governments lack motivation to deleverage
because they still have a strong incentive to develop their regional economies
under pressure from Beijing and in order for local officials to climb the
political ladder.
     "On the one hand, central government policy will affect the support channel
that local governments have traditionally gotten from their LGFVs" Liu said.
"But I think it comes down to how enforceable these [central government]
measures will be and how strictly they are going to be implemented everywhere."
     Loopholes in the system will continue to allow invisible local government
debt to increase with the help of LGFVs, she said.
     "I don't see them [policy measures] as a fundamental change that shifts the
direction of how local governments actually get support from their LGFVs," Liu
told MNI.
     Assessing Chinese local government debt using much broader criteria than
Chinese authorities and even other financial institutions, S&P Global has said
China's rapid credit growth would impede its economic growth and increase
financial risks. The ratings agency lowered its long-termed sovereign credit
ratings on China to "A+" from "AA-" and the short-term rating to "A-1" from
"A-1+" in late September.
     However, Chen Long, an analyst with Gavekal Dragonomics, a Beijing-based
research firm focusing on China's macro-economy, told MNI that concerns about
local government debt are overblown.
     "More debt is not necessarily a bad thing, and less debt is not necessarily
a good thing," Chen said, noting that credit growth has helped power China's
robust economic growth in recent years.
     Given limitations on local government access to tax revenues, the surge in
local government debt was inevitable, he argued.
     "Local governments need to raise funds for some projects because they have
economic goals they need to accomplish," Chen said. "But some [funding] channels
could not be used, so they could only use this channel," he said, referring to
financing through LGFVs. 
     He pointed to the dilemma of whether the costs of China's huge investment
in infrastructure projects -- which are primarily at the local level, usually
take a long time to complete and have low investment returns -- should be
shouldered by the central government or tackled by local governments using
self-financing or funding through off-balance-sheet LGFVs.
     In any case, local government are not likely to enforce the policy
directives from the central government at the expense of a "full cut-off" or a
rapid deceleration of local investment because "development is still China's
core task," Chen said. 
     Pei Yonggang, chief ratings director at Beijing-based Golden Credit Rating,
one of China's major ratings companies, said in an interview with MNI that
central government measures to control local government debt have been
effective, but more controls are needed to prevent increasing risks.
     "There will be stricter rules for LGFV bond issuance, and invisible debt at
the local level will be curbed" with more controls, Pei predicted. 
     LGFVs need to be reformed according to rules of the market, Pei said,
noting that the current debt-paying methods of local governments are not
     China's 2015 budget law requires that local governments may only borrow
through central-government-approved bond issues, and that their debt accumulated
before 2015 can only be repaid via debt-for-bond swaps. Outstanding local
government debt had reached CNY15.4 trillion at the beginning of 2015, according
to a report by the State Council.
     The State Council announced last year that the outstanding pre-2015 local
government debt would be swapped within three years. Some CNY3.2 trillion was
swapped in 2015, CNY4.87 trillion in 2016, and CNY2.15 trillion in the first
three quarters this year, according to Securities Times. CNY4.12 trillion in
local government debt still needs to be swapped.
     Liu of S&P Global predicted China would complete its debt-for-bond swap
program roughly by the end of this year or early next year.
     The central government and local governments are trying to achieve a
delicate balance between curbing rapid growth of local government debt while
maintaining stable economic growth, Liu said.
     "The central government is open to slower growth, but they also want stable
growth," Liu told MNI, adding that it is hard to predict how much "slower"
Beijing is willing to see growth go.
     The central government's No. 89 document, issued in August, encourages
provincial governments to issue bonds backed by specific infrastructure
projects. That will continue to add new debt at the local level and drive
economic growth.
--MNI Beijing Bureau; +86 (10) 8532-5998; email:
--MNI Beijing Bureau; +86 (10) 8532-5998; email: