Free Trial

STIR: Goldman: Post-Election Uncertainty May Persist, But Receive Jan FOMC

STIR

Late on Friday Goldman Sachs recommended a received January FOMC-dated OIS position, entering at 4.406%, targeting 4.28%. Contract last trades at ~4.40%.

  • Goldman noted that “while there are risks to an earlier deceleration than our baseline of per-meeting pace of cuts through Q1 we think the broader justification for delivering at least one cut over the near-term remains reasonably solid.”
  • “September has been the only unequivocally strong jobs report over the last several, the broader array of labor market indicators still paints a picture that is a bit softer than 2019, and the re-rating in growth and policy pricing leaves more vulnerability to disappointing news.”
103 words

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.

Late on Friday Goldman Sachs recommended a received January FOMC-dated OIS position, entering at 4.406%, targeting 4.28%. Contract last trades at ~4.40%.

  • Goldman noted that “while there are risks to an earlier deceleration than our baseline of per-meeting pace of cuts through Q1 we think the broader justification for delivering at least one cut over the near-term remains reasonably solid.”
  • “September has been the only unequivocally strong jobs report over the last several, the broader array of labor market indicators still paints a picture that is a bit softer than 2019, and the re-rating in growth and policy pricing leaves more vulnerability to disappointing news.”