CONSUMER STAPLES: Sudzucker; 7Y FV
(SZUGR; Baa2 Neg/BBB Neg)
Another not-so-great issuer choosing retail denoms - seems to be in-vogue.
We flagged CDS looked exposed in early July last year which has played out since. Sentiment seems to have caught up to the name now - generally a time to search for value but we are struggling to find where positives will come from in near-term. The negative catalyst to come include Ukraine's allowance to bring tariff-free sugar supply till June and the co's guidance for next year (12m to Feb '26) to stay a operating loss (EBIT <0) in core sugar segment. Rating agencies have reacted to the current FY guidance (EBITDA will more than half to guided €550-650m) - downgrades will depend on if/how quickly earnings can bounce - that in turn dependent on sugar prices.
We have red-flags on governance with this name. It has a 41-slide roadshow, not once mentioning this years or next years FY guidance and/or the drivers behind the EBITDA fall in sugar (it said in the earnings call half sugar price/ half cost side). It has a retail denominated floating perp that has been kept as permanent-like part of the debt structure - it pays +310 over 3m Euribor on that (currently 5.78% = €40m/yr in interest).
The 25s are retail denoms; historical performance is supportive of this issuance eventually performing. More recent retail denominated issuance (Sixt) is not showing any outperformance on the break.
Prelim FY results come 25th April.
- WNG €500m 7Y MS+225a vs. FV +210 (-15)
- books >€1.5b at IPT
- 1k/retail denominations
- UoP refi for €500m Nov line