Free Trial

US DATA: US Payrolls Wrap: Strong Recent Trends Trim Cut Expectations [2/2]

US DATA
  • Starting from a historical levels perspective, the benchmark revision to the outright number of payrolled employees was the most negative since 2009 but it wasn’t as bad as feared. The -598k revision left the non-seasonally adjusted level of payrolls in March 2024 0.4% lower than before Friday’s release but compared with -818k from the preliminary estimate released back in August and recent estimates we had seen between -670k to -700k based on latest QCEW data.
  • As for more recent trends, the 143k seasonally adjusted increase in nonfarm payrolls disappointed consensus of 175k but it was more than offset by a strong two-month upward revision of 100k. What’s more, these upward revisions were on figures already starting from a strong base, and we see the latest three-month trend standing at 237k as the more important takeaway than the latest pullback in January.
  • The realization of this recent trend strength was notable as there had been a risk that the annual revisions to seasonal adjustment factors could have lent on some of this strength. These revisions did indeed see a much less favorable factor in December (biasing seasonally adjusted payrolls growth lower on the month) but new information more than offset this considering there was a 51k upward revision for December alone.
  • Turning to the household survey, it was clearly stronger than expected at 4.01% (cons 4.1) to continue a pullback from cycle highs of 4.23% in November with its lowest since May 2024. We have some questions about the calculations adjusting for the population control but it doesn’t notably detract from a trend that sees the u/e rate moving away from the 4.3% that the median FOMC member forecast for 4Q25.
  • Rounding out the major variables from the report, average hourly earnings growth was far stronger than expected at 0.48% M/M (cons 0.3). However, this surprise acceleration coincided with a notable further decline in average weekly hours, to 34.1 from a downward revised 34.2 in Dec, leaving it at a joint low with only one-month in the pandemic and having last been seen in mid-2010. It’s all the more notable because the BLS categorically said Southern California wildfires and cold weather had no discernible effect on employment or hours worked.
image
366 words

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.
  • Starting from a historical levels perspective, the benchmark revision to the outright number of payrolled employees was the most negative since 2009 but it wasn’t as bad as feared. The -598k revision left the non-seasonally adjusted level of payrolls in March 2024 0.4% lower than before Friday’s release but compared with -818k from the preliminary estimate released back in August and recent estimates we had seen between -670k to -700k based on latest QCEW data.
  • As for more recent trends, the 143k seasonally adjusted increase in nonfarm payrolls disappointed consensus of 175k but it was more than offset by a strong two-month upward revision of 100k. What’s more, these upward revisions were on figures already starting from a strong base, and we see the latest three-month trend standing at 237k as the more important takeaway than the latest pullback in January.
  • The realization of this recent trend strength was notable as there had been a risk that the annual revisions to seasonal adjustment factors could have lent on some of this strength. These revisions did indeed see a much less favorable factor in December (biasing seasonally adjusted payrolls growth lower on the month) but new information more than offset this considering there was a 51k upward revision for December alone.
  • Turning to the household survey, it was clearly stronger than expected at 4.01% (cons 4.1) to continue a pullback from cycle highs of 4.23% in November with its lowest since May 2024. We have some questions about the calculations adjusting for the population control but it doesn’t notably detract from a trend that sees the u/e rate moving away from the 4.3% that the median FOMC member forecast for 4Q25.
  • Rounding out the major variables from the report, average hourly earnings growth was far stronger than expected at 0.48% M/M (cons 0.3). However, this surprise acceleration coincided with a notable further decline in average weekly hours, to 34.1 from a downward revised 34.2 in Dec, leaving it at a joint low with only one-month in the pandemic and having last been seen in mid-2010. It’s all the more notable because the BLS categorically said Southern California wildfires and cold weather had no discernible effect on employment or hours worked.
image