Free Trial

FOMC to Consider Reinvestment End at 'Upcoming Mtg;' Infl Debate>

--Several Officials Prepared to Announce Start Date in July, Minutes Say 
--Some Voters Want Evidence Soft Infl Transitory Before Next Hike 
--Financial Conditions Factor in Debate Over Mon Pol, Bal Sheet Cuts
By Jean Yung
     WASHINGTON (MNI) - Federal Reserve officials at their July policy 
meeting were split over how to respond to low inflation numbers in a 
time when unemployment continued to fall, though the policymakers agreed 
they were close to announcing the phase-out of balance sheet 
reinvestment, minutes of the meeting released Wednesday showed. 
     The continued easing of financial conditions as equity prices added 
to their gains and long-term rates stayed low was another topic of 
discussion, with one official arguing it warrants a tighter monetary 
policy than otherwise warranted and another viewing the development as a 
general adjustment to lower long-term neutral rates. 
     Several officials were prepared to announce a start date for 
reducing the Fed's balance sheet in July, the minutes said, though "most 
preferred to defer that decision until an upcoming meeting while 
accumulating additional information on the economic outlook and 
developments potentially affecting financial markets." 
     They noted the program was expected to contribute "only 
modestly to the reduction in policy accommodation" and would likely 
cause only a limited reaction in financial markets. 
     "Absent significant adverse developments in the economy or in 
financial markets," the Federal Open Market Committee should signal that 
implementation of the gradual cuts in reinvestment would begin 
"relatively soon," the minutes said. 
     The account also revealed a vigorous internal debate over the 
recent string of inflation readings that went to the core of the 
economic framework on which Fed forecasts are based. 
     Some officials noted they were increasingly uncertain regarding 
their outlook on inflation. They noted the FOMC "could afford to be 
patient under current circumstances in deciding when to increase the 
federal funds rate further and argued against additional adjustments 
until incoming information confirmed that the recent low readings on 
inflation were not likely to persist and that inflation was more clearly 
on a path toward the Committees symmetric 2 percent objective over the
medium term."  
     Though "most participants indicated that they expected inflation to 
pick up over the next couple of years from its current low level and to 
stabilize around the Committees 2% objective over the medium 
term," many acknowledged there was a risk that inflation could remain 
below 2% "for longer than they currently expected." 
     Fed staff economists ahead of the meeting revised down slightly 
their forecast for inflation for 2017 after weaker-than-expected data so 
far this year, though they continued to view the recent weakness as 
transitory. 
     Some voting members "stressed the importance of underscoring the 
Committees commitment to its inflation objective," the minutes said. 
"These members emphasized that, in considering the timing of further 
adjustments in the federal funds rate, they would be evaluating incoming 
information to assess the likelihood that recent low readings on 
inflation were transitory and that inflation was again on a trajectory 
consistent with achieving the Committees 2 percent objective over the 
medium term."
     The officials appeared increasingly puzzled by the trend of soft 
inflation in the face of full employment. A few policymakers went as far 
as citing evidence suggesting the Fed's theoretical framework -- which 
says pressures on prices and wages would rise as demand for goods, 
services and labor resources increased above sustainable levels -- was 
"not particularly useful" in forecasting inflation. 
--MNI Washington Bureau; tel: +1 202-371-2121; email: 
jean.yung@marketnews.com 
[TOPICS: MMUFE$,M$U$$$]

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.