Free Trial

MNI ANALYSIS: China PBOC Head To Retire Amid Reform Questions

By Nerys Avery
     LONDON (MNI) - For Zhou Xiaochuan, the man who has led the People's Bank of
China for a tumultuous 15 years, retirement appears to be imminent, although in
the black box that is Chinese politics nothing is ever certain until it's
announced. 
     The consensus is that having stayed on beyond the normal retirement age of
65 back in 2012 when Xi Jinping's new administration took the reins of power,
Zhou will, at almost 70, now have to exit. He is expected to lose his place on
the Central Committee, comprising the top 370 or so officials of the ruling
Communist Party, when it meets for its 19th Congress later this week, and will
be replaced as PBOC governor by January.
     Zhou rarely gives interviews, but earlier this month he turned to magazine
Caijing to give a lengthy overview of the country's financial reforms and his
opinions on the direction they should now take. 
     The governor reiterated the need to continue with the financial reforms he
has championed but that seem to have stalled under the leadership Xi Jinping - a
sign if ever there was one that his departure is on the near horizon.
     Zhou called for a troika of reforms - embrace free trade and investment,
dismantle controls over the capital account and continue to overhaul the
exchange-rate system to allow the market to decide the value of the yuan -
saying that an open economy was not possible without them. Whether his bosses in
the Politburo want an open economy is another question, however.
     He urged greater market access for foreign financial institutions, saying
trials had shown that the risks feared by policy makers had not turned out to be
as large as expected. He also issued a veiled warning to the leadership saying
that any window of opportunity to push ahead with reforms must be taken because
without such action the cost of reforms will rise in the future.
     Possibly reflecting his frustration at the pace of change and at the
opposition to reforms within parts of the policy-making circle, Zhou said China
cannot wait for conditions to be ripe to liberalize the exchange rate.
     GRIP ON POWER
     But Zhou's comments are those of an outgoing official who wants to put his
marker down. They should not be taken as a sign that the more conservative
leadership is going to turn the switch back to "on" for the reforms the PBOC
head began to implement and was then forced to halt. Expectations for any bold
moves on the part of Xi Jinping must be set in the context of reality - which is
the party's need for control, and the potentially destabilizing consequences for
a nation of 1.4 billion people of getting it wrong or miscalculating - without
mentioning the fear of the Chinese leadership of meeting the same fate as
Russia's Communist Party.
     Zhou become governor in 2002 at the start of an almost decade-long economic
boom and steered the financial system as the ruling Communist Party gave the
go-ahead to a series of fundamental overhauls to help the country integrate
itself into the global economic and financial system as part of its ambitions to
knock the U.S. and the dollar off their pre-eminent perches.
     These reforms, which are still in progress, include the shift to a
supposedly more market-oriented exchange-rate system that started in 2005, the
liberalization of the country's interest-rate system and the establishment of a
new regime based on money-market interest rates, opening up the capital account
and internationalization of the yuan which led to the historic but symbolic
entry of the yuan into the SDR, and, most recently, the development of inclusive
finance which is becoming a key plank of the government's economic policy.
     Yet Zhou's tenure has not been without missteps and backtracking, in spite
of his reputation. In June 2013, the PBOC badly misjudged liquidity conditions
which led to a destabilizing cash crunch in the interbank market that roiled
global markets. In August 2015, the central bank again shook global markets with
a badly communicated change in its exchange-rate management that led to a
de-facto devaluation of the yuan. December 2015 and January 2016 saw more forex
jitters after the PBOC launched a new trade-weighted index to value the yuan
against a basket of currencies and the yuan was allowed to drop precipitously.
     November and December 2016 saw the PBOC pull up the drawbridge on the
capital account to stem a deluge of capital outflows that was pressuring the
yuan and forcing the authorities to sell dollars by the bucket to stop the
Chinese currency from slumping. In May 2017, the PBOC introduced what it called
a "counter cyclical factor" into the way it calculates the yuan's daily
reference rate against the dollar, adding to market skepticism that it was
committed to a more market-driven system for valuing the currency.
     HIS MASTER'S VOICE
     Granted, Zhou may not have been making the decisions, but rather responding
to his master's voice. Nevertheless, these events don't burnish his image as a
reformer and champion of free markets. And even as he has touted monetary
prudence and the need to control financial risks and debt, Zhou has presided
over possibly the largest build-up of debt of any economy in modern world
history, the full consequences of which may not play out too long after he has
retired.
     The trouble started in 2008 when then Premier Wen Jiabao ordered banks to
open the lending taps to help support the economy and cushion it from the impact
of the global financial crisis. By the end of 2016, the country's total debt had
quadrupled to $27 trillion and non-financial sector debt stood at 236% of GDP
according to the IMF, up from 148% in 2007. The economy needs ever more debt to
meet the Communist Party's growth targets and in its latest Article IV report on
China released in August, the IMF estimated that total debt will double to $54
trillion in 2022 and that non-financial sector debt will rise to 296.7% of GDP.
     The fund has for several years been urging the Chinese leadership to rein
in debt and all three of the global ratings agencies have cut the country's
sovereign debt ratings in part because of the build-up of liabilities. Policy
makers are well aware of the warnings and the risks associated with such a rapid
accumulation of debt, and the cracks are already starting to appear in the
corporate sector where the debt problem is worst.
     Two years ago, President Xi Jinping started to call for action to begin the
process of deleveraging, and in May last year an unnamed senior party official
close to Xi told the People's Daily, the party mouthpiece, that high leverage
was an "original sin" and the root of all evil. Xi seemed to add to the sense of
urgency in April this year when he said that safeguarding financial security was
a "strategic and fundamental matter for China's social and economic
development."
     CRACKING DOWN...
     The focus so far has been on curbing leverage in the financial sector by
cracking down on financial institutions gaming a poorly-regulated shadow banking
industry. Some of the more risky practices are being reined in, such as the use
of leverage by financial institutions to buy high-yield wealth management
products, and the shifting of liabilities, especially high-risk loans, off
banks' balance sheets to be repackaged and sold as investments to other banks
and institutions. The PBOC is also cracking down on banks' use of the wholesale
markets to raise funds, with new limits on the issuance of negotiable
certificates of deposit and tighter control over how they are accounted for on
banks' balance sheets.
     There are some small signs of progress - data from the financial regulators
show that outstanding interbank assets and liabilities fell at the end of June
from the start of the year and have continued to shrink. Growth in wealth
management products (WMP) has also slowed, with the balance of interbank WMP
falling by CNY2.2 trillion from January to August 2017.
     In a report last month, economists at JPMorgan Chase & Co said that total
debt in the non-financial sector edged down from 269% of GDP in the first
quarter to 268% of GDP in the second quarter, while the corporate debt-to-GDP
ratio eased to 166% from 167%. Although they acknowledged the decline was
marginal, they said it was the first time since 2011 that total debt as a
percentage of GDP had declined.
     ...BUT DEBT STILL RISING
     These are small victories, to be sure. But other data show that debt is
still rising, with particularly strong growth in household debt.
     Figures released by the PBOC over the weekend show that the credit taps are
still flowing freely. Total social financing (TSF), the country's broadest
measure of credit that includes bank lending, equity and bond issuance as well
as shadow-banking activities such as trust loans and bankers' acceptances, was
CNY1.82 trillion in September, the biggest monthly figure since March, and new
loans were CNY1.27 trillion, the most since March. Outstanding TSF was up 13% at
CNY171.2 trillion at the end of September, still higher than the growth in
nominal GDP.
     At the IMF meetings in Washington last week, Zhou parroted the official
line that China's financial risks are "manageable", and the authorities have the
"capacity and confidence to prevent systemic risks and maintain healthy and
stable economic operations".
     Whether he believes that or not, it's not a problem Zhou will have to worry
about for much longer.
--MNI Beijing Bureau; +44 203-586-2244; email: nerys.avery@marketnews.com
--MNI BEIJING Bureau; +1 202-371-2121; email: john.carter@mni-news.com
[TOPICS: MMQPB$,M$A$$$,M$Q$$$,MC$$$$,MT$$$$,MGQ$$$]

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.