Free Trial

MNI EXCLUSIVE: Fed May Consider Yield Caps, Seen Wary For Now

By Evan Ryser and Jean Yung
     WASHINGTON (MNI) - The Federal Reserve is likely to further explore
adopting caps at the front end of the yield curve later this year, former Fed
officials told MNI, though they were divided as to its efficacy and expected the
central bank to remain wary of the policy at least in the near term.
     Yield curve control is among remaining policy options that could be
considered later in 2020, said former Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart,
adding that it would, if enacted, enhance control of longer-dated maturities and
help support a recovery in housing, autos and other consumer markets. However,
currently the shape of the yield curve and spreads between maturities are not
contributing to suppress economic activity, he noted.
     Steven Friedman, former director of market analysis at the New York Fed,
said a policy of "capping yields out two or three years would be very beneficial
for the Treasury keeping funding costs low," together with forward guidance.
     But some officials are apprehensive about making a commitment which if they
fail to meet it would risk serious damage to Fed credibility.
     While Roberto Perli, former Fed economist and a partner at Conerstone
Macro, agreed that the Fed might eventually decide to target rates on bonds of
up to two or three years' maturity, he noted that "yield curve control would
require some heavy lifting in the Committee."
     "I wouldn't exclude it eventually, but this year seems soon to me," Perli
said.
     Yield curve control - last adopted in the 1940s and debated within the FOMC
since the financial crisis - would lead the Fed to purchase not a pre-set quota
of bonds but as many as necessary to bring them back in line if they rose past a
certain limit. The Bank of Japan has used the policy and Australia recently
adopted it.
     -- HEAVY LIFTING
     Joseph Gagnon, a former Fed official currently at the Peterson Institute
for International Economics, cast doubt on whether yield curve control gets "an
outcome that's much different" from large-scale asset purchases.
     "We have no idea what's going to be appropriate six months from now, let
alone 12 months from now," Gagnon said. "It could be needed at some point if we
really have to put the pedal to the metal but it's just not clear that the
economy's going to be lacking enough aggregate demand going forward."
     If yields start to rise then the Fed would rather opt to step up asset
purchases and "slap it back down," Gagnon said.
     Chair Jerome Powell Apr. 9 indicated the Fed's focus would be on
implementing its many emergency facilities before moving on to consider yield
curve control. Fed Governor Lael Brainard in a February 21 speech noted the
advantages of yield curve control when complemented by forward guidance, and
Dallas Fed leader Rob Kaplan told MNI in mid-February that the Fed should at
least be "open" to it.
     -- EXIT STRATEGY
     The exit strategy from yield curve control would be "an issue," according
to Perli.
     "The exit is going to be complicated regardless of what instrument they
use," he said. "I don't think they are going to unwind Treasuries for the
foreseeable future - ever, and longer. We need to redefine what normal is in
terms of what the Fed balance sheet is, and I would think going to yield curve
control would complicate things even more."
     Gagnon added: "That exit process is going to be kind of messy. They are
worried about that, and so they would rather do what they're doing."
     No other central bank has exited from yield curve control in recent times,
but the Fed from 1942 until 1951 capped yields on Treasury securities to help
finance wartime spending. A recently released New York Fed blog noted that
fixing the level of Treasury yields forced the Fed "to buy whatever private
investors did not want to hold at the fixed rates," and eventually led to the
1951 Treasury-Fed accord.
--MNI Washington Bureau; +1 202 371 2121; email: evan.ryser@marketnews.com
[TOPICS: MMUFE$,M$U$$$,MT$$$$,MX$$$$]

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.