Free Trial

FED: Pre-Minutes FOMC Communications: Doves Lean Increasingly Cautious (2/3)

FED

Chair Powell’s semi-annual Congressional testimony more or less repeated the themes of the January FOMC meeting press conference – sometimes verbatim (“we do not need to be in a hurry to adjust our policy stance”) –  and he sounded cautiously optimistic on inflation even after the January print (“I would say we're close, but not there on inflation.”) But he sounded more hawkish on the labor market front after January's employment data, telling the Senate Banking Committee that the labor market was "very strong".

  • Powell is among the more dovish members of the Committee at this point, but it’s worth noting that the other prominent dovish-leaning members have taken a more cautious tone as well.
  • NY Fed President Williams called policy “modestly” restrictive, a term that has been used by hawks and could be considered less dovish vs his previous commentary in mid-January ("somewhat restrictive”).
  • Chicago's Goolsbee, a 2025 voter, said that despite his view that called January's CPI data "sobering" and said "there’s no question, if we got multiple months like this, then the job is clearly not done” Gov Kugler: "the prudent step is to hold the federal funds rate where it is for some time" VC Jefferson noted “I do not think we need to be in a hurry to change our stance”.
  • Gov Waller called January's CPI "mildly disappointing...the data are not supporting a reduction in the policy rate at this time…if this wintertime lull in progress is temporary, as it was last year, then further policy easing will be appropriate. But until that is clear, I favor holding the policy rate steady."
  • Boston's Collins (notably, pre-jobs and inflation data): "it's really appropriate for policy to be patient, careful, and there's no urgency for making additional adjustments, especially given all of the uncertainty, even though, of course, we're still somewhat restrictive… what I would say is, again, there is more to do".
  • And SF's Daly "At this point, policy needs to remain restrictive until, from my vantage point, until I see that we are really continuing to make progress on inflation.”
  • Philadelphia's Harker took a longer-run view: "While I won't commit to a specific timetable, I remain optimistic that inflation will continue a downward path and the policy rate will be able to decline over the long run".
375 words

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.

Chair Powell’s semi-annual Congressional testimony more or less repeated the themes of the January FOMC meeting press conference – sometimes verbatim (“we do not need to be in a hurry to adjust our policy stance”) –  and he sounded cautiously optimistic on inflation even after the January print (“I would say we're close, but not there on inflation.”) But he sounded more hawkish on the labor market front after January's employment data, telling the Senate Banking Committee that the labor market was "very strong".

  • Powell is among the more dovish members of the Committee at this point, but it’s worth noting that the other prominent dovish-leaning members have taken a more cautious tone as well.
  • NY Fed President Williams called policy “modestly” restrictive, a term that has been used by hawks and could be considered less dovish vs his previous commentary in mid-January ("somewhat restrictive”).
  • Chicago's Goolsbee, a 2025 voter, said that despite his view that called January's CPI data "sobering" and said "there’s no question, if we got multiple months like this, then the job is clearly not done” Gov Kugler: "the prudent step is to hold the federal funds rate where it is for some time" VC Jefferson noted “I do not think we need to be in a hurry to change our stance”.
  • Gov Waller called January's CPI "mildly disappointing...the data are not supporting a reduction in the policy rate at this time…if this wintertime lull in progress is temporary, as it was last year, then further policy easing will be appropriate. But until that is clear, I favor holding the policy rate steady."
  • Boston's Collins (notably, pre-jobs and inflation data): "it's really appropriate for policy to be patient, careful, and there's no urgency for making additional adjustments, especially given all of the uncertainty, even though, of course, we're still somewhat restrictive… what I would say is, again, there is more to do".
  • And SF's Daly "At this point, policy needs to remain restrictive until, from my vantage point, until I see that we are really continuing to make progress on inflation.”
  • Philadelphia's Harker took a longer-run view: "While I won't commit to a specific timetable, I remain optimistic that inflation will continue a downward path and the policy rate will be able to decline over the long run".