REPEAT: MNI: Phil Fed Econs: Unempl Not Best Infl Predictor

Repeats Story Initially Transmitted at 21:12 GMT Aug 31/17:12 EST Aug 31

--Suggest Past Inflation Trend, Expectations May Be Better Predictors

--New Research Questions Helpfulness of Phillips Curve in Forecasting Inflation

By Karen Mracek

     WASHINGTON (MNI) - When looking for the best indicators of future

inflation, look to inflation expectations and even past inflation trends instead

of the employment gap, economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Federal Reserve Bank told MNI in an exclusive interview.

     The lack of inflation growth during the economic recovery has disappointed

and puzzled policymakers. This is because the Phillips curve model, which uses

the employment gap to predict inflation, "is not very helpful," Michael Dotsey,

director of research at the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank, said.

     Dotsey, along with Philadelphia Fed economists Shigeru Fujita and Tom

Stark, authored a paper that found "find no evidence for relying on the Phillips

curve during normal times, such as those currently facing the U.S. economy."

     Instead, "inflation itself, even just the simple naive forecast," may be a

better predictor of inflation, Stark said in an interview Wednesday. "Or how

fast the economy is growing. Growth-type of relationships are perhaps more

revealing."

     These days, "we are always very concerned about the way inflation

expectations feed into inflation," Stark said. "Inflation expectations are a

reasonable thing to look at ... to see whether (professional forecasters) are

anticipating" inflation.

     "One thing many, many people look at is what professional forecasters

think," he added, plugging the Philadelphia Fed's quarterly Survey of

Professional Forecasters.

     In the latest survey, economists marked down their forecast for core and

headline inflation measures. They now expected inflation to reach the Fed's 2%

target for core PCE in 2019, versus in 2018 in the previous quarter's survey.

     Measured on a fourth-quarter over fourth-quarter basis, the inflation

outlook released Aug. 11 was significantly lower for headline CPI inflation and

headline PCE inflation in 2017. Headline CPI was downgraded to an expected 1.7%

this year, versus 2.3% in the last survey. Headline PCE was down to 1.5%

forecast from 1.8% in the previous quarter. Meanwhile inflation for 2018 and

2019 was downgraded but only slightly.

     The policymaking Federal Open Market Committee also watches inflation

expectations to help forecast future inflation and in their most recent

statement said "survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations are

little changed, on balance."

     The Philadelphia Fed economists don't say for sure other non-employment

factors are better at predicting inflation -- their research focuses on the

Phillips curve. But they do say unemployment -- or rather the employment gap,

which measures how far the economy is from maximum employment -- "does not add

much value," Dotsey said.

     "The first baby step is to identify the problem," Stark explains. "What

this paper says is essentially, we don't see much benefit of using the Phillips

curve."

     Dotsey explained their research does not rule out that other labor measures

-- those that help economists to understand wage inflation, such as measures of

job movements -- could be helpful in forecasting inflation, just that "the

unemployment gap is not particularly helpful."

     The research finds the Phillips curve "may add value to the monetary policy

process during downturns, but the evidence is far from conclusive."

     Therefore the authors are not suggesting a complete abandonment of the

Phillips curve, which has been widely used since a paper by its namesake in

1958. Instead, they suggest policymakers look at many different models for

forecasting inflation. 

     One take away from their research, Stark said, "is if you put very high

forecast from Phillips curve, maybe want to take it down a notch."

--MNI Washington Bureau;tel: +1 202 371-2121; email: karen.mracek@marketnews.com