Free Trial

US TSYS/SUPPLY: Tsy Cash Level Assumptions Subject To Downside In Reality

US TSYS/SUPPLY

To put Treasury's new financing projections into context, the Jan-Mar borrowing requirement of $815B would be the largest (nominal $) of any Q1, even though the financing requirement of $520B is not as high as the $656B in Q1 2023. The difference between the two dynamics is due to the large drop in the cash balance in Q1 2023 ($269B), compared with the anticipated cash raise of $128B in that quarter.

  • As for why Treasury sees such a sharp drop-off in Apr-Jun borrowing, to $123B - along with a financing need that is negative (-$20B) - it's not that unusual. Q2 2024 saw a $234B borrowing requirement on a net negative financing need (-$9B), with Q2 2022 similar.
  • As such it's probably the case that Treasury is expecting a bumper tax take in April 2025 (though it's hard to know for sure). It also suggests that even if this proves ambitious, the risks to actual marketable borrowing vs the projection are probably to the downside, given the cash level at end-Q2 is likely to be lower than the projected $850B. Those $850B figures should be considered placeholders given that they don't reflect the likelihood of cash being drained so long as Treasury is confined by the debt limit that is currently in place.
  • We may get a better sense of Treasury's current thinking on the debt limit in Wednesday's refunding announcement.

Overall the release reflects the fact that there is a new Treasury Secretary and regime in town, and that may also be influencing the relatively benign outlook for borrowing - here's the economic outlook in this quarter's Economy Statement for the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee, which notably highlights that the Trump administration looks to reduce deficits: 

Keep reading...Show less
446 words

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.

To put Treasury's new financing projections into context, the Jan-Mar borrowing requirement of $815B would be the largest (nominal $) of any Q1, even though the financing requirement of $520B is not as high as the $656B in Q1 2023. The difference between the two dynamics is due to the large drop in the cash balance in Q1 2023 ($269B), compared with the anticipated cash raise of $128B in that quarter.

  • As for why Treasury sees such a sharp drop-off in Apr-Jun borrowing, to $123B - along with a financing need that is negative (-$20B) - it's not that unusual. Q2 2024 saw a $234B borrowing requirement on a net negative financing need (-$9B), with Q2 2022 similar.
  • As such it's probably the case that Treasury is expecting a bumper tax take in April 2025 (though it's hard to know for sure). It also suggests that even if this proves ambitious, the risks to actual marketable borrowing vs the projection are probably to the downside, given the cash level at end-Q2 is likely to be lower than the projected $850B. Those $850B figures should be considered placeholders given that they don't reflect the likelihood of cash being drained so long as Treasury is confined by the debt limit that is currently in place.
  • We may get a better sense of Treasury's current thinking on the debt limit in Wednesday's refunding announcement.

Overall the release reflects the fact that there is a new Treasury Secretary and regime in town, and that may also be influencing the relatively benign outlook for borrowing - here's the economic outlook in this quarter's Economy Statement for the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee, which notably highlights that the Trump administration looks to reduce deficits: 

Keep reading...Show less