Free Trial

MNI ANALYSIS: Ex-BOE Exec: QE Unwind As Monpol Likely Undoable

MNI (London)
--TSC Adviser, ex-BOE, Bill Allen Says BOE Can't Sustain Silence On QE Unwind
--Allen Advocates T-Bill Switch; Can't Treat Gilt Sales As Monpol Tool
By David Robinson
     LONDON (MNI) - The Bank of England's deafening silence over its plans to
unwind quantitative easing is unsustainable, an adviser to the Treasury Select
Committee (TSC) and former top BOE executive, said.
     Bill Allen, former BOE Deputy Director, said that the central bank's
current approach to QE unwinding, with the Monetary Policy Committee issuing
guidance that entails it is unlikely to happen any time soon while offering no
detail on how it will work, cannot be maintained.
     "It is certainly not sustainable. The Fed have published very detailed
guidance ... The Bank of England are miles behind and they are in danger of
painting themselves into a corner," Allen told Market News International
exclusively.
     Dave Ramsden, the top Treasury official who starts as the BOE's new deputy
governor for markets and banking next month and who will have the unenviable job
of leading on QE unwind, is set for a public confirmation hearing with the TSC.
His predecessor, Charlotte Hogg, offered the committee no enlightenment on the
Bank's QE strategy.
     "When Charlotte Hogg was being interviewed by the Treasury Select Committee
(about) QE she had nothing new to say. She just repeated what (Governor Mark)
Carney had said before," Allen said.
     The BOE has bought stg435 billion of gilts, equivalent to around three
years of gross gilt issuance, as well as stg10 billion of corporate bonds.
     The MPC's guidance on unwinding QE has evolved from saying it would start
once Bank Rate, currently at 0.25%, was "raised to a level from which it can be
cut materially" to adding that this was "judged to be around 2%."
     The MPC has also stated that the proceeds of maturing gilts will be
reinvested, so the QE gilt stock is not getting any smaller and with market rate
curves showing Bank Rate still below 1% and the end of the BOE's three year
forecast horizon, so there is no indication of when unwinding is likely to
start.
     Allen thinks that the sheer scale of the debt overhang means it is
unrealistic to use gilt sales as a tool for tightening monetary policy.
     "I think that is impossible. They have got to find a way of easing the
gilts back into the market ... You have to do it when the market is there. It is
not that liquid a market, so what you have to do is to sell the gilts when you
can and adapt short-term interest rate policy ... to compensate for its effect
on the economy," Allen said.
     While Carney has made the case for using Bank Rate as the initial policy
tightening tool there has been precious little clarity over how QE unwind is
expected to proceed if and when Bank Rate does finally hit 2%.
     Allen, in an article published by the National Institute of Economic and
Social Research in its August Review, set out one way that the BOE could
disencumber itself of its gilt burden. 
     Allen is concerned that with the government guaranteeing any losses on the
Bank's QE purchases and its stg100 billion plus bank funding scheme, its
independence is being compromised with some 95% of its assets having a Treasury
guarantee.
     Allen's proposal is to put the Debt Management Office in control of the
Bank's gilts by transferring them to the DMO in exchange for newly-created
Treasury bills, which the Bank could then proceed to sell in a few months.
     Commercial banks would end up with Treasury bills while lowering their
balances at the BOE, which Allen believes would be policy neutral as it would
not result in any change in bank behaviour.
     The Treasury bills and BOE balances are both liquid assets so there would
be no change to the banks liquidity coverage ratio.
     Also "with Treasury bills there is almost no interest rate risk so it
wouldn't affect their interest rate risk position. It doesn't affect their
credit risk positioning either because they are both zero weighted. I don't
think it would affect the banks behaviour at all," Allen said.
     The DMO, on the other hand, would be left with the challenge of having to
auction the pile of extra gilts, which would likely take years to complete and
would tend to steepen the yield curve.
     "The Bank of England might decide to go easy on raising short-term interest
rates while the gilts are being sold. That is the kind of thing they would
assess as they went along," he said.
     The MPC would, in this scenario, be factoring into policy the impact of
gilt sales that were dictated by market conditions rather than determining the
scale, and timetable, for those sales.
     If the MPC does see the need to add stimulus with Bank Rate at its
effective zero lower bound, which it reckons is above zero but below the current
0.25%, Allen thinks it should look at credit easing.
     When the global financial crisis bit deep, the BOE's easing strategy was
set under the strictures of former Governor Mervyn King, who was firmly opposed
to credit easing, leaving the MPC with its mass gilt purchases.
     "They could try that (credit easing) next time as that is a lot easier to
unwind because the short-term debt just runs off by itself," Allen said.
     Carney and his MPC colleagues have publicly highlighted the evidence that
QE has not become impotent. While the effects of the second round of QE appeared
to be less than the first, the latest post-Brexit vote easing has seemingly had
more impact than they had expected.
     The big question left hanging is how they are going to unwind it. Ramsden's
upcoming confirmation hearing in front of the TSC, with the date still to be
fixed as the committee has yet to re-convene following the general election and
Summer recess, will be one occasion to try and get more clarity and fresh
thinking on it.
     "It is an important question and I think the Bank of England ought to be
saying more about it than they have done, which is almost nothing," Allen said.
--MNI London Bureau; tel: +44 203-586-2223; email: david.robinson@marketnews.com
--MNI London Bureau; tel: +44 203-586-2225; email: les.commons@marketnews.com
[TOPICS: M$B$$$,M$E$$$,MX$$$$,M$$BE$]
MNI London Bureau | +44 203-865-3812 | les.commons@marketnews.com
MNI London Bureau | +44 203-865-3812 | les.commons@marketnews.com

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.