Free Trial

CAPITAL GOODS: SKF (SKFBSS Baa1/NR/BBB+): Consent Solicitation Aftermath

CAPITAL GOODS
  • SKF’s move last week to seek consent solicitation triggered further tightening, with the 31s almost 60bp tighter post announcement.
  • SKF’s position is that no event of default occurred, and it described the solicitation as a “matter of prudence”.
  • It’s an interesting case study in game theory; by seeking consent it has emboldened the view that the planned spinoff will allow bondholders to claim an event of default. This contrasts with Essity who consistently rejected claims and are headed to the courts.
  • We have seen low probability of a successful argument for default here, with 22% of assets, 30% of sales and 13% of adjusted operating profit affected, against language of “substantial” looking ambiguous at best. If little harm is done it could be tough to argue through that ambiguity.
  • While an understandable motivation, it’s hard to view this as anything other than a misstep by SKF; they have offered 25c for a change that would take the bonds several points lower leaving bondholders with no incentive to accept.

    SKFBSS 12
164 words

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.
  • SKF’s move last week to seek consent solicitation triggered further tightening, with the 31s almost 60bp tighter post announcement.
  • SKF’s position is that no event of default occurred, and it described the solicitation as a “matter of prudence”.
  • It’s an interesting case study in game theory; by seeking consent it has emboldened the view that the planned spinoff will allow bondholders to claim an event of default. This contrasts with Essity who consistently rejected claims and are headed to the courts.
  • We have seen low probability of a successful argument for default here, with 22% of assets, 30% of sales and 13% of adjusted operating profit affected, against language of “substantial” looking ambiguous at best. If little harm is done it could be tough to argue through that ambiguity.
  • While an understandable motivation, it’s hard to view this as anything other than a misstep by SKF; they have offered 25c for a change that would take the bonds several points lower leaving bondholders with no incentive to accept.

    SKFBSS 12