Free Trial

FOMC Minutes Excerpt: 'Several' Ready to Move on Bal Sheet in July>

--'Some' Want More Info Infl Decline Transitory Before Another Hike
--'Some Others' Worry Tightening Labor Mkt Risks Infl Overshoot
     WASHINGTON (MNI) - The following is an excerpt of the Federal Open 
Market Committee minutes describing committee's policy action, 
published Wednesday for the July 25-26 meeting: 
     In their discussion of monetary policy, participants reaffirmed 
their view that a gradual approach to removing policy accommodation was 
likely to remain appropriate to promote the Committees objectives of 
maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. Participants commented on a 
number of factors that would influence their ongoing assessments of the 
appropriate path for the federal funds rate. Most saw the outlook for 
economic activity and the labor market as little changed from their 
earlier projections and continued to anticipate that inflation would 
stabilize around the Committees 2 percent objective over the medium 
term. However, some participants expressed concern about the recent 
decline in inflation, which had occurred even as resource utilization 
had tightened, and noted their increased uncertainty about the outlook 
for inflation. They observed that the Committee could afford to be 
patient under current circumstances in deciding when to increase the 
federal funds rate further and argued against additional adjustments 
until incoming information confirmed that the recent low readings on 
inflation were not likely to persist and that inflation was more clearly 
on a path toward the Committees symmetric 2 percent objective over the 
medium term. In contrast, some other participants were more worried 
about risks arising from a labor market that had already reached full 
employment and was projected to tighten further or from the easing in 
financial conditions that had developed since the Committees policy 
normalization process was initiated in December 2015. They cautioned 
that a delay in gradually removing policy accommodation could result in 
an overshooting of the Committees inflation objective that would likely 
be costly to reverse, or that a delay could lead to an intensification 
of financial stability risks or to other imbalances that might prove 
difficult to unwind. One participant stressed that the risks both to the 
Committees inflation objective and to financial stability would require 
careful monitoring. This participant expressed the view that a gradual 
approach to removing policy accommodation would likely strike the 
appropriate balance between promoting the Committees inflation and full 
employment objectives and mitigating financial stability concerns. 
     A number of participants also commented that the appropriate pace 
of normalization of the federal funds rate would depend on how financial 
conditions evolved and on the implications of those developments for the 
pace of economic activity. Among the considerations mentioned were the 
extent of current downward pressure on longer-term yields arising from 
the Federal Reserves asset holdings and how this pressure would 
diminish over time as balance sheet normalization proceeded, the 
strength and degree of persistence of other domestic and global factors 
that had contributed to the easing of financial conditions and elevated 
asset prices, and whether and how much the neutral rate of interest 
would rise as the economy continued to expand. 
     Participants also discussed the appropriate time to implement the 
plan for reducing the Federal Reserves securities holdings that was 
announced in June in the Committees postmeeting statement and its 
Addendum to the Policy Normalization Principles and Plans. Participants 
generally agreed that, in light of their current assessment of economic 
conditions and the outlook, it was appropriate to signal that 
implementation of the program likely would begin relatively soon, absent 
significant adverse developments in the economy or in financial markets. 
Many noted that the program was expected to contribute only modestly to 
the reduction in policy accommodation. Several reiterated that, once the 
program was under way, further adjustments to the stance of monetary 
policy in response to economic developments would be centered on changes 
in the target range for the federal funds rate. Although several 
participants were prepared to announce a starting date for the program 
at the current meeting, most preferred to defer that decision until an 
upcoming meeting while accumulating additional information on the 
economic outlook and developments potentially affecting financial 
markets. 
--MNI Washington Bureau; tel: +1 202-371-2121; email: 
karen.mracek@marketnews.com 
[TOPICS: MMUFE$,M$U$$$]

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.