Free Trial

MNI INTERVIEW: Bespoke EU-UK Financial Sector Deal Unlikely

--Professor Niamh Moloney: Pessimistic Over Bespoke EU-UK Financial Services
System
--Next BOE Governor Bailey Hopes For "Managed Divergence" From EU
By David Robinson
     LONDON (MNI) - The European Union is unlikely to be able to create a
bespoke system to facilitate "managed divergence" for UK financial services
regulation after Brexit, an idea championed by Bank of England
governor-designate Andrew Bailey, a leading European financial law expert told
MNI.
     Law professor Niamh Moloney, who has given evidence to various
parliamentary inquiries and is a Member of the Board of Appeal of the European
Supervisory Authorities, highlighted the difficulty of trying to reverse
engineer the EU's technocratic equivalence process, which was designed to
protect EU financial stability by bringing other regimes more into line with its
regulations.
     Under current rules, EU regulatory equivalence status, which facilitates
cross-border financial services business, can be withdrawn with 30 days' notice
and Bailey and colleagues want a system that will give them room for regulatory
manoeuvre without the risk of sudden termination of equivalence.
     But Moloney pointed out that the EU's equivalence regime is devised to
minimise divergence, and to alert Brussels to any divergence in regulatory
standards.
     "A process of managed divergence has much to offer both sides. However, the
equivalence regime as currently devised is about managing convergence rather
than divergence," she said.
     "Recent reforms, in 2019, suggest that the EU is gearing up for stronger
reporting on divergence in third countries and all of this suggests that
convergence rather than divergence is increasingly the focus of the EU," Moloney
added.
     A chink of light for UK regulators is that the equivalence process does
stress the need for assessments to be proportionate and risk-based, which allows
some divergence, but it is far from clear that this will be adequate for British
purposes.
     --RISK OF UNCERTAINTY
     "If one puts together those notions, proportionality and risk-based
assessment, there could be a way forward there, but it is unlikely that the
equivalence process as currently designed can institutionalise divergence,"
Moloney said.
     Giving evidence this month to the House of Lords EU Financial Affairs
Sub-Committee Bailey and Bank of England Deputy Governor Sam Woods made clear
that they did not believe it was realistic for the UK to mirror EU regulations
after Brexit. They also acknowledged the risk that managed divergence may not be
achievable and that the risk of sudden removal of equivalence would fuel
uncertainty for parts of the UK financial sector.
     Woods said that as far as he understood it the UK government's objective is
"to achieve some kind of greater durability around equivalence. If it can be
withdrawn with 30 days' notice, firms are going to be quite reluctant to put
much weight on it. I hope it will be possible to agree something more durable,
but whether that will be the case in the negotiations is hard to say."
     Brussels and London committed to completing an assessment on whether the UK
will start out as equivalent by the end of June and Moloney said that the
wording around that decision would be important for pointers on where the
process might head.
     The EU Negotiating Mandate published on Tuesday, however, made no reference
to an end June date. It did have a reference to cooperation on financial
services, which highlighted the union's supremacy over the process, stating that
"equivalence mechanisms and decisions remain defined and implemented on a
unilateral basis by the European Union."
     The UK could face a substantial economic hit from a loss of access to the
EU for its financial services sector, with Woods saying that roughly GBP30
billion of financial sector output, equivalent to 1.5% of GDP, directly involves
EU clients and some GBP50 billion of the sector's output is closely linked to
the EU in some way.
--MNI London Bureau; +44 203 865 3829; email: jason.webb@marketnews.com
[TOPICS: M$B$$$,M$E$$$,MT$$$$,MX$$$$]

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.