Free Trial

MNI INTERVIEW: Eurozone Deficit Fines Should Be Scrapped

By Silvia Marchetti
     ROME(MNI) - Barring countries that fall short of fiscal requirements from
accessing common European funds could be more effective than resorting to a
system of sanctions which has lost credibility, Massimo Bordignon, a member of
the European Fiscal Board which is advising the European Commission on potential
changes to the EU's Stability and Growth Pact, told MNI.
     "It has become ever more difficult to impose sanctions on member states
that do not respect the EU's budgetary rules, and in fact they've almost never
been imposed for political reasons, Bordignon said in an interview.
     The power to apply sanctions such as fines, via mechanisms including the
excessive debt procedure, grants an excessively political role to the European
Commission, said Bordignon.
     Since a 2013 rule change, the European Council, which groups heads of
states, has only been able to block proposed fiscal sanctions with the vote of
70% of countries. Previously, the Council had to approve sanctions by qualified
majority.
     "If on the one hand the European Commission tends to avoid proposing
sanctions due to its overly political role and the fact that sanctions are
politically unpopular, on the other hand, if it did do so, the current voting
scheme would bar the Council, which should be the real political body, from any
power of decision," said Bordignon.
     The effectiveness of the Stability and Growth Pact's rules was called into
question as early as 2003, when France and Germany escaped sanction for fiscal
blowouts. Fines for Portugal and Spain were also waived in 2016.
     --INEFFICIENT
     Sanctions are inefficient in pushing governments to pursue fiscal
adjustment and would also be counterproductive if imposed during hard economic
times, he said.
     "Not only is imposing sanctions very hard today but it is also
counter-cyclical. Another more sensible alternative to raise pressure on
countries that fall short of EU fiscal criteria would be to bar their access to
common EU tools of support, for instance access to the European Stability
Mechanism," and to EU structural funds, said Bordignon.
     "As opposed to sanctions, this path has incentives and would be much more
effective. Countries would be more willing to stick to the rules for fear of
being denied access to common safety nets, they'd have a clear picture of what
they'd be denied."
     Currently, fines, which can in theory be as much as 0.2% of a country's
GDP, are kept frozen in an interest-free account, but are eventually returned to
the offender.
     Agreement on abandoning the system of sanctions might be made easier by
ongoing moves to reform eurozone fiscal rules, Bordignon said.
     The European Commission is due to publish its recommendations on reforming
the Stability and Growth Pact, which sets out the region's fiscal rules, early
in 2020 following delays over the nomination of the new Commission.
--MNI London Bureau; +44 203 865 3829; email: jason.webb@marketnews.com
[TOPICS: M$X$$$,MC$$$$,MX$$$$,MFX$$$,MGX$$$]

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.