Free Trial

Q3'23 QCEW Jobs Revised Up, Slightly Lower Downside NFP Revision Risks

US DATA

A note on the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) revisions released this morning:

  • Revisions were made to Q1 through Q3 2023, but the Q4 job estimates were completely unchanged - the BLS tells MNI that Q4 will only be revised in subsequent releases. That puts attention squarely on August's release of Q1 2024 prelim data, which also provides the initial basis for the annual benchmarking of nonfarm payrolls in early 2025.
  • More specifically, the level of QCEW employment in Q1 and Q2 was revised slightly lower, with Q3 revised sharply higher (255k more employed in Sept 2023 at 154.028m vs an original 153.773m estimate), but then Oct/Nov/Dec are unchanged, with Dec levels staying at 154.848m.
  • Put another way, the overall end-2023 numbers remain the same: QCEW job gains through 2023 as a whole were 2.323m (unrevised), compared with overall NFP gains of 3.013m, or a 193.5k monthly pace vs 251.1k pace.
  • It stands to reason that the Jul-Sep upward revisions suggest that QCEW presents less of a downside risk to the Establishment survey payrolls numbers when they are revised, if they translate into a higher end-2023 QCEW level overall. But we will have to wait a few more months to find out.
  • For what it's worth, there have been upward revisions to the level of employment in September in each of the last 6 years in the 1st to 2nd reading. and each time, the 2nd reading of Q4 employment has subsequently been revised up. (In 2022, Q3 was revised up by 258k, with the subsequent Q4 revision being +207k).
  • So it seems likely from this standpoint that that there will be an upward revision to the Q4 estimate - which should reduce the gap with the nonfarm payrolls reading.

Source: BLS, MNI Calculations

305 words

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.

A note on the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) revisions released this morning:

  • Revisions were made to Q1 through Q3 2023, but the Q4 job estimates were completely unchanged - the BLS tells MNI that Q4 will only be revised in subsequent releases. That puts attention squarely on August's release of Q1 2024 prelim data, which also provides the initial basis for the annual benchmarking of nonfarm payrolls in early 2025.
  • More specifically, the level of QCEW employment in Q1 and Q2 was revised slightly lower, with Q3 revised sharply higher (255k more employed in Sept 2023 at 154.028m vs an original 153.773m estimate), but then Oct/Nov/Dec are unchanged, with Dec levels staying at 154.848m.
  • Put another way, the overall end-2023 numbers remain the same: QCEW job gains through 2023 as a whole were 2.323m (unrevised), compared with overall NFP gains of 3.013m, or a 193.5k monthly pace vs 251.1k pace.
  • It stands to reason that the Jul-Sep upward revisions suggest that QCEW presents less of a downside risk to the Establishment survey payrolls numbers when they are revised, if they translate into a higher end-2023 QCEW level overall. But we will have to wait a few more months to find out.
  • For what it's worth, there have been upward revisions to the level of employment in September in each of the last 6 years in the 1st to 2nd reading. and each time, the 2nd reading of Q4 employment has subsequently been revised up. (In 2022, Q3 was revised up by 258k, with the subsequent Q4 revision being +207k).
  • So it seems likely from this standpoint that that there will be an upward revision to the Q4 estimate - which should reduce the gap with the nonfarm payrolls reading.

Source: BLS, MNI Calculations