Free Trial

Yellen to Detail Stab Concerns, Mon Pol Impact in Jackson Hole

By Karen Mracek
     WASHINGTON (MNI) - Just because the topic of Federal Reserve Chair Janet
Yellen's speech in Jackson Hole this week is financial stability doesn't mean it
won't have implications for monetary policy.
     Yellen is the 10 a.m. ET keynote speaker Friday at the Kansas City Fed's
annual economic symposium, the topic of which is "Fostering a Dynamic Global
Economy."
     But while the topic of Yellen's speech usually has more to do with
regulation than rates and could turn off some Fed watchers, there's more than a
few reasons to tune in.
     For starters, Yellen spoke in the same time slot at the conference last
year, and although her speech was on "The Federal Reserve's Monetary Policy
Toolkit: Past, Present and Future," she dedicated time early on in her largely
academic presentation to talk about the current economic conditions and the
outlook. Expect her to do the same this year.
     A more important reason to pay attention, however, is the increasing
concern about financial stability risks and their role in the Fed's monetary
policy setting.
     Several Federal Open Market Committee members have cited financial
conditions easing despite Fed rate increases as a reason to keep pace with their
tightening plans. Fed Vice Chair Stanley Fischer in a recent Financial Times
interview expressed concern about the persistently low level of real long-term
interest rates and the recent rise in equities.
     The growing debate about financial stability was evident in the minutes of
the July FOMC meeting which detailed a discussion about the impact of financial
conditions on the timing of removing policy accommodation.
     While it is largely expected that the Fed will begin to reduce the balance
sheet in September by tapering the amount of securities it reinvests each month,
the FOMC said it will weigh financial stability issues when making this
decision.
     More than just the balance sheet, though, the minutes said a number of
participants "commented that the appropriate pace of normalization of the
federal funds rate would depend on how financial conditions evolved and on the
implications of those developments for the pace of economic activity."
     Financial stability is not officially part of the Fed's dual mandate for
price stability and maximum employment, but it is never far from the discussion
about policy. 
     Among concerns the FOMC has is the downward pressure on longer-term yields
caused by the $4.5 trillion balance sheet, "and how this pressure would diminish
over time as balance sheet normalization proceeded," the minutes said.
     The FOMC is also concerned about "the strength and degree of persistence of
other domestic and global factors that had contributed to the easing of
financial conditions and elevated asset prices," the minutes said.
     Yellen made headlines in July when she told Congress that "Because the
neutral rate is currently quite low by historical standards, the federal funds
rate would not have to rise all that much further to get to a neutral policy
stance."
     However, the next sentence in her testimony was largely overlooked. "But
because we also anticipate that the factors that are currently holding down the
neutral rate will diminish somewhat over time, additional gradual rate hikes are
likely to be appropriate over the next few years to sustain the economic
expansion and return inflation to our 2% goal."
     Just how much the neutral rate of interest "would rise as the economy
continued to expand," was discussed by the FOMC at its July meeting.
     The FOMC noted longer-term real and nominal Treasury yields "remained very
low by historical standards, apparently weighed down by accommodative monetary
policies abroad and possibly by declines in the long-term neutral real interest
rate over recent years."
     A number of participants "pointed to potential concerns about low
longer-term interest rates, including the possibility that inflation
expectations were too low, that yields could rise abruptly, or that low yields
were inducing investors to take on excessive risk in a search for higher
returns," the minutes said.
     Different assessments were expressed, the minutes said, about the
implications of this development for the outlook for aggregate demand and,
consequently, appropriate monetary policy. This seems to be a debate Yellen is
likely to weigh in on in her Jackson Hole remarks.
     One view at the meeting was that easy financial conditions have offset "by
other factors influencing financial markets, and that a tighter monetary policy
than otherwise was warranted," the minutes said.
     The FOMC gets a regular briefing on financial stability at every other
meeting -- when there is not an update to the Summary of Economic Projections
and a press conference by the chair. But July's minutes showed a lengthier
discussion than usual about these financial stability issues.
     While Yellen is likely to articulate her view on the impact of financial
stability on monetary policy, she will likely keep the option of another rate
hike this year on the table, just like New York Fed President William Dudley did
earlier in the month in an Associated Press interview.
     "I think it depends on how the economic forecast evolves," he said. "If it
evolves in line with my expectations, I would expect -- I would be in favor of
doing another rate hike later this year."
     With the balance sheet decision looming at the September meeting, the FOMC
has time before the December meeting to decide if the drop in inflation really
is temporary or if they are dealing with something more permanent, and if
another rate hike this year is appropriate.
--MNI Washington Bureau;tel: +1 202 371-2121; email: karen.mracek@marketnews.com
[TOPICS: MMUFE$,M$U$$$,MT$$$$]

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.