Free Trial

January Minutes: QT Taper Set To Start Later...With Longer Runoff? (2/2)

FED

For balance sheet policy, the "eventual decision" implies that the quickest possible timeline to slow runoff is likely the March press conference/meeting minutes set up a May decision and a mid-year start to tapering QT.

  • But the risks seem very much tilted to an even later move: we haven't heard any urgency from participants on taking action on this issue, and there isn't anything concrete tying a decision to the ON RRP facility running down. The staff description of the unworrying state of reserves and the pace of decline likely to mirror QT runoff suggests the decision will be based on how the FOMC sees liquidity issues manifesting themselves in money markets, and nothing mechanical to do with ON RRP running out (contrary to some analyst expectations).
  • The Treasury taper could also turn out to be more gradual than the consensus envisaging a halving to $30B/month from $60B/month from midyear: some participants noted "given the uncertainty surrounding estimates of the ample level of reserves, slowing the pace of runoff could help smooth the transition to that level of reserves or could allow the Committee to continue balance sheet runoff for longer".

Taken together, the communications from the minutes mean the best guess is that the FOMC is very tentatively envisaging a first cut in June and quarterly cuts thereafter coinciding with new economic projections - consistent with the December SEP for 3x cuts in 2024. The QT taper could be finalized and announced in May (to avoid complicated communications alongside a June cut) for a June start, potentially with a less drastic cut in runoff pace to begin with (ie to $45B from $60B), but risks are firmly that a decision could wait until June or July.

Keep reading...Show less
384 words

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.

For balance sheet policy, the "eventual decision" implies that the quickest possible timeline to slow runoff is likely the March press conference/meeting minutes set up a May decision and a mid-year start to tapering QT.

  • But the risks seem very much tilted to an even later move: we haven't heard any urgency from participants on taking action on this issue, and there isn't anything concrete tying a decision to the ON RRP facility running down. The staff description of the unworrying state of reserves and the pace of decline likely to mirror QT runoff suggests the decision will be based on how the FOMC sees liquidity issues manifesting themselves in money markets, and nothing mechanical to do with ON RRP running out (contrary to some analyst expectations).
  • The Treasury taper could also turn out to be more gradual than the consensus envisaging a halving to $30B/month from $60B/month from midyear: some participants noted "given the uncertainty surrounding estimates of the ample level of reserves, slowing the pace of runoff could help smooth the transition to that level of reserves or could allow the Committee to continue balance sheet runoff for longer".

Taken together, the communications from the minutes mean the best guess is that the FOMC is very tentatively envisaging a first cut in June and quarterly cuts thereafter coinciding with new economic projections - consistent with the December SEP for 3x cuts in 2024. The QT taper could be finalized and announced in May (to avoid complicated communications alongside a June cut) for a June start, potentially with a less drastic cut in runoff pace to begin with (ie to $45B from $60B), but risks are firmly that a decision could wait until June or July.

Keep reading...Show less