Free Trial

MNI INTERVIEW: Replacing RPI Will Save UK Money: OBR's Bean

--OBR Assessment Finds Net Fiscal Boost From Ending Linkage To RPI For Gilts,
Others
By David Robinson
     LONDON (MNI) - The UK government could save money if it acted on delayed
deliberations over switching its inflation-linked gilts and other prices away
from the discredited retail price index, top Office for Budget Responsibility
official Sir Charles Bean told MNI.
     Expectations of a prompt move to replace RPI with a consumer prices measure
were dashed in April when the government, its attention increasingly drawn
elsewhere as Brexit sowed political turmoil, failed to keep a promise to respond
by the end of April to a report on the matter by the House of Lords Economic
Affairs Committee.
     Officials had indicated that they might be reluctant to abandon RPI if such
a move would be expensive, despite the fact that the index's methodological
flaws mean it systematically overstates inflation. RPI has run an average 0.7
percentage point higher than the consumer price index in recent years, and while
dropping the gauge might save the Treasury money paid in interest to investors
in inflation-linked bonds, it could cut returns from other items tracking the
index, such as student loans and excise duties.
     But Bean said in an interview that this would not be the case. Debt
interest payments on index-linked gilts in the 2019-20 fiscal year alone would
be stg3.1 billion lower if RPI were replaced by a consumer price measure, with
savings rising to stg4.4 billion in 2023-24, according to the OBR's Fiscal Risks
report. After factoring in revenue losses from excise duties and interest on
student loans, the OBR still found that that net effect would be positive, with
borrowing lowered by stg2.3 billion in 2020-21.
     The risk that such a switch might undermine confidence among investors in
UK government debt may also be overstated, Bean said.
     "One of the issues that we do note is that there is a bit of a risk that if
you change the reference of the index .. that it might be deemed a breach of
faith by investors so it might undermine market confidence," he said. "Now,
personally, I don't think that is particularly likely because this doesn't look
like something where the government has chosen ... to pull a fast one."
     Investors would understand that RPI had been a fundamentally flawed way of
calculating price changes, he added, noting that, optimally, the index would
also cease to be used for adjusting student loans and other prices. It would
also be possible to keep the RPI label and rework the way it is calculated to
bring it into line with CPI.
     With pension funds having extensive RPI-based liabilities, the demand for
RPI linkers has been strong. The share of UK debt in inflation-linked bonds is
far larger than in other advanced economies, at around double the next largest,
and the total pool is now equivalent to close to 20% of GDP.
     The official statisticians have done their job in setting out the technical
shortcomings of RPI, Bean said: "To me it really puts the ball in the
Chancellor's court, the government's court more generally."
--MNI London Bureau; tel: +44 203-586-2223; email: david.robinson@marketnews.com
[TOPICS: M$B$$$,M$E$$$,MT$$$$,MX$$$$,MFB$$$,MGB$$$]

To read the full story

Close

Why MNI

MNI is the leading provider

of intelligence and analysis on the Global Fixed Income, Foreign Exchange and Energy markets. We use an innovative combination of real-time analysis, deep fundamental research and journalism to provide unique and actionable insights for traders and investors. Our "All signal, no noise" approach drives an intelligence service that is succinct and timely, which is highly regarded by our time constrained client base.

Our Head Office is in London with offices in Chicago, Washington and Beijing, as well as an on the ground presence in other major financial centres across the world.