May 30, 2024 09:20 GMT
SMRs Still Too Costly, Risky and Slow to Build: IEEFA
POWER
Small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) are still too costly, slow to build, and risky to play a substantial role in transitioning from fossil fuels in the next 10-15 years, the Institute of Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) said.
- Operating as well as proposed SMRs indicate that the reactors will continue to cost far more and take much longer to build than promised by supporters, according to IEEFA.
- Regulators, utilities, investors, and government officials should recognise that renewables are instead the near-term solution to the energy transition, IEEFA added.
- SMRs are generally reactors that have no more than 300MW, although a few are larger.
- Several EU countries are assessing whether to implement SMRs, including the Nordics, Poland, Estonia, France and the UK.
119 words